Games to Watch (1/27/2019)

Starting this season, I’ve decided to catalog the most tournament-relevant games to watch (if there are any) each night, along with the tip-off time, TV channel, and projected score of the game when input into my own personal game-scoring model. I will also revisit the projections from the day before to archive their accuracy.

YESTERDAY’S GAMES

Iowa State (14-5) @ Ole Miss (14-4)

Projected Score: Ole Miss – 74, Iowa State – 72
Actual Score: Iowa State – 87, Ole Miss – 73

Florida (11-7) @ TCU (14-4)

Projected Score: TCU – 70, Florida – 65
Actual Score: TCU – 55, Florida – 50

Ohio State (12-6) @ Nebraska (13-6)

Projected Score: Nebraska – 73, Ohio State – 64
Actual Score: Ohio State – 70, Nebraska – 60

Alabama (12-6) @ Baylor (12-6)

Projected Score: Baylor – 72, Alabama – 68
Actual Score: Baylor – 73, Alabama – 68

Pittsburgh (12-7) @ Louisville (14-5)

Projected Score: Louisville – 77, Pittsburgh – 66
Actual Score: Louisville – 66, Pittsburgh – 51

Davidson (14-5) @ Saint Louis (14-5)

Projected Score: Saint Louis – 66, Davidson – 63
Actual Score: Davidson – 54, Saint Louis – 53

VCU (13-6) @ Duquesne (14-5)

Projected Score: VCU – 71, Duquesne – 67
Actual Score: VCU – 80, Duquesne – 74

Kansas (16-3) @ Kentucky (15-3)

Projected Score: Kentucky – 76, Kansas – 71
Actual Score: Kentucky – 71, Kansas – 63

Vermont (15-5) @ Stony Brook (17-3)

Projected Score: Vermont – 69, Stony Brook – 68
Actual Score: Vermont – 73, Stony Brook – 52

Syracuse (14-5) @ Virginia Tech (15-3)

Projected Score: Virginia Tech – 72, Syracuse – 63
Actual Score: Virginia Tech – 78, Syracuse – 56

Auburn (13-5) @ Mississippi State (14-4)

Projected Score: Mississippi State – 76, Auburn – 75
Actual Score: Mississippi State – 92, Auburn – 84

2019 Model Pick Record: 76-30

TODAY’S GAMES

Cincinnati (17-3) @ Temple (15-4)

Tip Time: 12 PM EST
TV Channel: CBS Sports Network
Projected Score: Cincinnati – 71, Temple – 68

Michigan State (18-2) @ Purdue (13-6)

Tip Time: 1 PM EST
TV Channel: CBS
Projected Score: Michigan State – 76, Purdue – 73

Seton Hall (12-7) @ Villanova (15-4)

Tip Time: 2:30 PM EST
TV Channel: Fox
Projected Score: Villanova – 78, Seton Hall – 69

Iowa (16-4) @ Minnesota (14-5)

Tip Time: 5 PM EST
TV Channel: Fox Sports 1
Projected Score: Iowa – 76, Minnesota – 75

Advertisement

Games to Watch (1/26/2019)

Starting this season, I’ve decided to catalog the most tournament-relevant games to watch (if there are any) each night, along with the tip-off time, TV channel, and projected score of the game when input into my own personal game-scoring model. I will also revisit the projections from the day before to archive their accuracy.

YESTERDAY’S GAMES

Michigan (18-1) @ Indiana (12-7)

Projected Score: Michigan – 68, Indiana – 64
Actual Score: Michigan – 69, Indiana – 46

Buffalo (17-2) @ Kent State (15-4)

Projected Score: Buffalo – 82, Kent State – 74
Actual Score: Buffalo – 88, Kent State – 79

Butler (12-8) @ Creighton (11-8)

Projected Score: Creighton – 78, Butler – 77
Actual Score: Creighton – 75, Butler – 61

2019 Model Pick Record: 68-27

TODAY’S GAMES

Iowa State (14-5) @ Ole Miss (14-4)

Tip Time: 12 PM EST
TV Channel: ESPN
Projected Score: Ole Miss – 74, Iowa State – 72

Florida (11-7) @ TCU (14-4)

Tip Time: 12 PM EST
TV Channel: ESPN2
Projected Score: TCU – 70, Florida – 65

Ohio State (12-6) @ Nebraska (13-6)

Tip Time: 12 PM EST
TV Channel: Fox Sports 1
Projected Score: Nebraska – 73, Ohio State – 64

Alabama (12-6) @ Baylor (12-6)

Tip Time: 12 PM EST
TV Channel: ESPNU
Projected Score: Baylor – 72, Alabama – 68

Pittsburgh (12-7) @ Louisville (14-5)

Tip Time: 2 PM EST
TV Channel: ACC Network
Projected Score: Louisville – 77, Pittsburgh – 66

Davidson (14-5) @ Saint Louis (14-5)

Tip Time: 2 PM EST
TV Channel: CBS Sports Network
Projected Score: Saint Louis – 66, Davidson – 63

VCU (13-6) @ Duquesne (14-5)

Tip Time: 2 PM EST
TV Channel: ESPN+
Projected Score: VCU – 71, Duquesne – 67

Kansas (16-3) @ Kentucky (15-3)

Tip Time: 6 PM EST
TV Channel: ESPN
Projected Score: Kentucky – 76, Kansas – 71

Vermont (15-5) @ Stony Brook (17-3)

Tip Time: 7 PM EST
TV Channel: ESPN3
Projected Score: Vermont – 69, Stony Brook – 68

Syracuse (14-5) @ Virginia Tech (15-3)

Tip Time: 8 PM EST
TV Channel: ESPN
Projected Score: Virginia Tech – 72, Syracuse – 63

Auburn (13-5) @ Mississippi State (14-4)

Tip Time: 8:30 PM EST
TV Channel: SEC Network
Projected Score: Mississippi State – 76, Auburn – 75

Games to Watch (1/25/2019)

Starting this season, I’ve decided to catalog the most tournament-relevant games to watch (if there are any) each night, along with the tip-off time, TV channel, and projected score of the game when input into my own personal game-scoring model. I will also revisit the projections from the day before to archive their accuracy.

YESTERDAY’S GAMES

Michigan State (17-2) @ Iowa (16-3)

Projected Score: Michigan State – 80, Iowa – 74
Actual Score: Michigan State – 82, Iowa – 67

Memphis (12-6) @ Temple (14-4)

Projected Score: Temple – 80, Memphis – 76
Actual Score: Temple – 85, Memphis – 76

Texas State (16-3) @ Georgia State (14-5)

Projected Score: Georgia State – 70, Texas State – 68
Actual Score: Texas State – 81, Georgia State – 68

NC State (15-3) @ Louisville (13-5)

Projected Score: Louisville – 80, NC State – 75
Actual Score: Louisville – 84, NC State – 77

Belmont (13-4) @ Murray State (15-2)

Projected Score: Murray State – 83, Belmont – 74
Actual Score: Belmont – 79, Murray State – 66

2019 Model Pick Record: 65-27

TODAY’S GAMES

Michigan (18-1) @ Indiana (12-7)

Tip Time: 6:30 PM EST
TV Channel: Fox Sports 1
Projected Score: Michigan – 68, Indiana – 64

Buffalo (17-2) @ Kent State (15-4)

Tip Time: 6:30 PM EST
TV Channel: CBS Sports Network
Projected Score: Buffalo – 82, Kent State – 74

Butler (12-8) @ Creighton (11-8)

Tip Time: 8:30 PM EST
TV Channel: Fox Sports 1
Projected Score: Creighton – 78, Butler – 77

Games to Watch (1/24/2019)

Starting this season, I’ve decided to catalog the most tournament-relevant games to watch (if there are any) each night, along with the tip-off time, TV channel, and projected score of the game when input into my own personal game-scoring model. I will also revisit the projections from the day before to archive their accuracy.

YESTERDAY’S GAMES

Texas (11-7) @ TCU (13-4)

Projected Score: TCU – 71, Texas – 69
Actual Score: TCU – 65, Texas – 61

Purdue (12-6) @ Ohio State (12-5)

Projected Score: Purdue – 71, Ohio State – 69
Actual Score: Purdue – 79, Ohio State – 67

2019 Model Pick Record: 62-25

TODAY’S GAMES

Michigan State (17-2) @ Iowa (16-3)

Tip Time: 7 PM EST
TV Channel: Fox Sports 1
Projected Score: Michigan State – 80, Iowa – 74

Memphis (12-6) @ Temple (14-4)

Tip Time: 7 PM EST
TV Channel: CBS Sports Network
Projected Score: Temple – 80, Memphis – 76

Texas State (16-3) @ Georgia State (14-5)

Tip Time: 7 PM EST
TV Channel: ESPN+
Projected Score: Georgia State – 70, Texas State – 68

NC State (15-3) @ Louisville (13-5)

Tip Time: 8 PM EST
TV Channel: ACC Network
Projected Score: Louisville – 80, NC State – 75

Belmont (13-4) @ Murray State (15-2)

Tip Time: 9 PM EST
TV Channel: ESPNU
Projected Score: Murray State – 83, Belmont – 74

March Madness – Every Team has a Weakness

I’m a huge college basketball fanatic, so March is inherently one of my favorite months of the year. Never mind the 30-degree Michigan weather outside; I’m ready to hunker down inside and watch some college hoops anyway. With March comes the NCAA Division I Men’s Basketball Tournament, which I affectionately call The Big Dance. With The Big Dance, we inevitably see everybody and their brother (or sister…no sexism here) suddenly become a college basketball guru, as they fill out their bracket either by chalk (picking almost exclusively higher seeds) or by some crazy strategy (coin flips, cooler mascot, dartboard, team colors, etc.). I hate both methods, but mostly because I desperately want my statistical analysis and basketball knowledge to actually reflect in the success of filling out a bracket, and too often it is the case that it does not. Nevertheless, I will not stop in my hunt for filling out a truly great bracket.

Sometimes I worry that I may have peaked in my bracket-predicting ability too young. I correctly picked the NCAA Champion 6 years in a row in a stretch from the 2001-2002 season (shout out to Steve Blake and Juan Dixon for starting the streak with the Terps) to the 2006-2007 season (How could you pick against Al Horford and Joakim Noah after winning the year before?). Starting in 2008, Kevin Love, Russell Westbrook, and UCLA let me down by falling to Memphis in the Final Four. That left a sour taste in my mouth, but not as sour as watching the star-studded Pittsburgh team I picked to win it all in 2009 (Levance Fields, DeJuan Blair, and Sam Young) fall in the Elite 8 after letting Scottie Reynolds of Nova drive coast to coast with 5 seconds left to win the game with a layup. I didn’t think it could get any worse…and that, of course, is when it gets worse. With the ballsiest three-point attempt of the decade, Ali Farokhmanesh of Northern Iowa sealed the fate of my National Championship pick Kansas in the Round of 32 in 2010; for the third straight year, things had gotten progressively worse.

Fast forward ahead to 2012, and it had been 4 straight years of INCORRECTLY picking the National Champion after 6 straight years of glory. The essentially all-professional college team led by John Calipari out of Lexington was a virtual lock to win it all last year, and both my basketball knowledge and statistical analysis (which has been nicknamed “The Bracket Machine”) confirmed this. Thus, I was able to get back on the horse last year and correctly pick the NCAA Tournament Champion. However, I don’t want that streak to last a mere year, so I need to break down this year’s field and see who has the best chance to cut down the nets. Herein lies the problem; with so much more parity in college basketball this year than in past years, it is going to be very difficult to accurately pick the champion. My basketball knowledge favors one team, while “The Bracket Machine” is telling me something else. Thus, I’m going to fill out two brackets this year – one with picks from the gut, the other with picks from a statistical analysis machine.

In reality, every team with a legitimate shot at making a final four run has at least one glaring weakness, and it’s just a matter of deciding which team’s weaknesses will be hidden and which will be on display. That’s what I’m here for – breaking down the final four contenders and their weaknesses, and telling you what my gut says, as well as what the machine spit out.

THE BIG PLAYERS

These are the big dogs that have a very good shot at making the Final Four. I expect at least 3 of these teams to compose the group of 4 that makes it to Atlanta, with the National Champion coming from this group.

1. Louisville –
 Weakness: Inconsistent play from Russ Smith. Russdiculous is a great player and the Cardinals leading scorer at 18 points a game, but he is maddeningly erratic from game-to-game with his shot selection and decision-making. In Louisville’s 5 losses this season, Smith is shooting 25 for 78 from the field, so if he has a woeful game, the Cardinals could fall victim to an upset.

russ-smith

(I’m not so certain I would put my trust in Russ…but that does look like a mighty delicious plate of waffles.)

2. Indiana Weakness: Tom Crean’s lack of NCAA tournament success. While Crean is generally considered one of the better coaches in all of college basketball, he’s had a surprising lack of tournament success. Since becoming a head coach in 1999 at Marquette, Crean’s only made it to the final four once (on the back of Dwayne Wade), and his career NCAA Tournament record is 7-6, which is far from sterling.

3. Kansas – Weakness: Offensive Efficiency. Kansas has improved their offense leaps and bounds since that abysmal loss to TCU earlier this year, but it’s still not pretty. This team may win with defense, but since 2003, every national champion has had an offensive efficiency above 115.5 and in the top 20 – Kansas is at 112.7 and 25th.

4. Florida – Weakness: No go-to guy. Billy Donovan’s team is very well-rounded, but they don’t have that one go-to guy that they can get the ball to in a tie game with the pressure on. Erik Murphy doesn’t have the ball skills and speed to be that guy, Scottie Wilbekin is way more of a defender than an offensive stalwart, and Kenny Boynton is too passive in settling for a jump shot.

5. Syracuse – Weakness: Mental toughness. When the going gets tough, the Orange most certainly do not get going. Boeheim and his crew had Louisville on the ropes in the first half of the Big East Championship, and at the first sign of amped up Louisville pressure and some adversity, they folded like a beach chair.

6. Ohio State – Weakness: Live and die by Deshaun Thomas. Nobody on Ohio State is averaging double figures in scoring besides Deshaun Thomas. Furthermore, Thomas has a tendency to sometimes slip into a mode where he wants to get his before he cares about the outcome for his team. If he can get a lot of touches in his sweet spot on the left block, the Buckeyes will be a tough out. By the same token, if he starts settling for contested threes, they could be an earlier out.

7. Duke – Weakness: Defense. The Blue Devils can hit shots from all over the court and score in bunches. If Cook, Kelly, and Curry are all knocking down shots, this team is damn near impossible to guard. However, they also have a tendency to fall asleep on the other end of the court and let hot shooting opponents do the same thing. Team that with the fact that they don’t have a reliable rebounder outside of Plumlee, and this team is susceptible to defeat at the hands of a more physical, grind-it-out type of team.

8. Michigan State – Weakness: Keith Appling. I don’t mean to single out one player, but in the case of the Spartans, I really have no choice. Appling is capable of being one of the better point guards in the nation, but unlike Adreian Payne and Gary Harris, he hasn’t even come close to approaching his ceiling. Unfortunately for Spartan fans, it has become a nightmarish trend to watch Appling disappear in big games, often times because he tries too hard to out-duel the opposing team’s point guard.

9. Miami (FL) – Weakness: Lack of tournament experience. Outside of Jim Larranaga’s improbable Final Four run when he was at the helm of George Mason, the members of this team (and this program in general) lack the NCAA Tournament pedigree and experience. Handling the moment when you’ve never been there before can be quite a challenge, even for a starting lineup filled with 4 seniors.


THE MIDDLE-MEN THAT CAN MAKE A RUN

These teams have a solid shot of sneaking out of their regional (one of them will probably pull it off) and getting to Atlanta, but might not have quite enough firepower, experience, or clutch to win the whole thing.

1. Gonzaga – Weakness: Haven’t been tested because of soft schedule. I will give credit to the Zags for going out and playing at Oklahoma State and at Butler, and having Illinois and Kansas State come out to Spokane. However, they went 2-2 in those games against teams whose average seed line in this tournament is 5.5. What’s going to happen when they have to consistently match up with the big boys and win multiple games in a row to survive?

2. Michigan – Weakness: Playing soft. The Wolverines are great on the offensive end of the floor and have two NBA-caliber guards in Trey Burke and Tim Hardaway Jr.. However, on the defensive end, they struggle with being physical and stopping dribble penetration using guard-to-guard help. John Beilein’s defensive strategies of avoiding fouls and switching ball-screens have been figured out and exploited by Big Ten teams this season, so it’ll be a matter of how he adjusts going into the tournament.

3. Wisconsin – Weakness: Inability to play from behind. If you’re in to fundamentally-sound, slow, methodical basketball on both ends of the court, then Wisconsin basketball is for you. Unfortunately, this style does not lend itself to comebacks and playing from behind, something a team must be capable of doing in order to make a run in the tournament. If Wisconsin lets a team get hot from the field early, they could be leaving the tournament early.

bo-ryan-grinch-2

 (Instead of stealing Christmas, Bo Ryan steals joy out of my heart.)

4. New Mexico – Weakness: A tendency to go ice cold from the field. The Lobos play some very effective defense, are athletic, and really take care of the ball. However, they averaged under 58 points per game in their 5 losses this season – a number which was actually significantly inflated by a 89-88 loss to Air Force to end the regular season. It’s hard to see them finding ways to consistently outscore opponents and make a deep run with such inconsistent shooting performances.

5. Georgetown – Weakness: Otto Porter Jr. can’t do everything in every game. Porter leads the Hoyas in points per game, rebounds, steals, blocks, free throw percentage, three point percentage, and minutes per game. He is mister do-it-all for John Thompson III and crew, and has been an All-American up to this point in the season. However, at some point, he’s going to get burnt out and need his teammates to pick up the slack – something I’m not sure they are all that capable of doing.


THE SLEEPERS

There are a lot of crazies out there that love picking a good dark horse to pull some stellar upsets and make a run; if you’re going to do that, I suggest you pick from this list.

1. Saint Louis – Weakness: Putting the ball in the basket. The Billikens take care of the basketball and don’t give up any easy baskets on the defensive end of the court. However, in order to string together multiple wins in this tournament, you have to be able to get some easy baskets and score the ball. This well-rounded team has the capability to make a run based on their defense, but could get tripped up early if they continue to struggle on the offensive end.

2. VCU – Weakness: Facing teams that don’t turn the ball over. The “Havoc” defense that Shaka Smart and his deep, athletic team employee on a game-to-game basis can cause opposing coaches hairs to turn gray. However, when the opposing team handles the pressure and limits their turnovers, VCU becomes a surprisingly average team on both the offensive and defensive end, as well as on the glass.

vcu-havoc-seats

(I don’t think VCU’s “Havoc” defense can single-handedly lead them to another deep tournament run.)

3. North Carolina – Weakness: Playing defense with a small lineup. North Carolina has experienced some great success this season ever since Roy Williams switched to his newfound, smaller, four-guard lineup. That being said, this lineup has caused North Carolina to fall into stretches where defense and consistent rebounding disappear, and those are obviously two things that can’t happen if UNC wants to make a run this year.

4. NC State – Weakness: A lack of passion, heart, and emotion. NC State is one of the most athletic, talented, and capable teams in the entire tournament. However, they’re also one of the most underachieving, and have been all season long. Richard Howell is a man among boys, Scott Wood consistently knocks down threes, and C.J. Leslie is a freak athlete and player. Unfortunately, it is too often the case that I’ve seen this team not handle adversity well this season, and play emotionless, passionless basketball. 

After all the basketball I’ve watched and all the numbers I’ve crunched, I still can’t quite make a decision on who to pick as my National Champion. Having watched the copious amounts of college basketball I’ve watched this season, my gut tells me that Indiana is the best basketball team in the country. The statistical analysis from “The Bracket Machine” seems to believe that Louisville is the team to beat. Either way, I really hope these two teams meet in Atlanta on Monday, April 8th (assuming, of course, that my alma mater falls short of the championship), because that would be one hell of a matchup for a chance to hold up the trophy.

The Outcome in New Orleans

All four teams peaked at the right time and all have that go-to-guy when the game is in its closing minutes. For each team, this guy has the ability to create plays and put his respective team in the position to win. These guys are as follows: Peyton Siva for Louisville, Michael Kidd-Gilchrist for Kentucky, Tyshawn Taylor for Kansas, and William Buford for Ohio State.  Watch for all four to play a huge role for their team in upcoming games.

________________________________

A Look at the Games:

Kentucky vs. Louisville

For the second consecutive year, a team from the Big East, Louisville that is, has won the conference tournament, and followed it up with a deep run in the NCAA tournament, with one player carrying the load for the team. Peyton Siva is playing the role of “Kardiac Kemba” throughout both tourneys this year. With him having to carry the load, and Kentucky playing tremendous defense, look for him to struggle, especially with Anthony Davis in the middle preventing him from getting to the rim.

With Kentucky, look for them to play how they usually do. They will prevent Louisville from getting into the lane, controlling the boards and doing what they do offensively. It’s hard to predict who will have the “best game” for them, but in order for them to be successful Anthony Davis will have to be the best player on that team. He will have to do the dirty work, rebounding, blocking shots, and preventing any easy looks at the basket in the paint.

Outcome: : It will be a close game in the first half, but with Kentucky’s depth, size, and shooting ability, they will eventually give Louisville fits. If Davis plays well, Kentucky will win. If he plays poorly and ends up in foul trouble, look for the game to be close, with Kentucky winning in a squeaker.

________________________________

Ohio State vs. Kansas

Ohio State had an up and down season with injuries and the usual “dog days” struggle that most teams have.  Already having played Kansas once (without Sullinger due to an injury) should be a huge factor in Ohio State’s game plan. If  Buford can get hot early, and Craft can lock down, while Taylor and Sullinger can hold Thomas Robinson to single digits or get him in foul trouble, then should have a successful game and be playing on Monday.

Kansas is a team that has arguably one of the most under-the-radar players in the past decade – Tyshawn Taylor. He has been one of the few guys to have played all four years of his college career and be successful in doing so. This helps Kansas tremendously in having a true PG that has seen pretty much everything in the game of basketball. He has struggled shooting the three in the tourney this year, and according to ESPN, he has never made a three point shot in a dome in his college career. If he can get it going, look for them to be playing Kentucky on Monday night.

Outcome: This one is a tough game to predict, but it is going to come down to the Big Men down low. If Thomas Robinson and Jeff Withey can dominate the game, Kansas wins. If Sullinger dominates the game down low, OSU will emerge victorious. Look for the experience at the Guard and Center positions to help Kansas in this game; they have been in big games like this before. Kansas wins in a close one.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Author: Zach Tanton